Module 3

The Customised Institution Report and Word of Mouth Search Engine

Real insight into your marketing and corporate strategy

Module 3 now comes in two parts; a report individually tailored to your institution and an online search engine that interrogates over 300,000 verbatim comments.

Combined, these address your marketing fundamentals including your key competitive strengths and weaknesses; the kind of students you attract; why you get rejected; how well you execute your key marketing processes; what students most value about your location; how reputation affects your applications; and much more.

The written report compares your university to your competitors – either a basket of competitors, looking at the views of those who chose them in favour of your institution, or a single competitor. You decide.

The Word of Mouth Search Engine allows you to see exactly what students say about universities – yours and all other UK HEIs. We ask students to tell us in their own words, unprompted, why they chose their current university, why they declined other universities and how the universities they have experienced could improve. The comments can be searched by a range of filters for year, current university, rejected university and theme of response. It’s a powerful tool for understanding the student voice, and illustrating your case internally.

What you get

  • Detailed management summary
  • Key performance indicators
  • Over 200 customised PowerPoint slides packed with charts and tables
  • Institution-wide login for online Word of Mouth Search Engine

*For no extra cost you can combine the last two years of results in a single report for even more robust comparisons.

Investment

2011/12 only – £4,400
11/12 + 10/11 – £5,600
11/12 + 10/11 + 09/10 – £6,600
11/12 + 10/11 + 09/10 + 08/09 – £7,400
11/12 + 10/11 + 09/10 + 08/09 + 07/08 – £8,000

Call 020 7288 8789 to order

The first 10 orders receive a 10% discount
The next 20 orders receive a 5% discount

Notes
Customers subscribing to this module in previous years will be resupplied with previous years’ data at no extra cost.

Please note that the questionnaire has developed over the last five years so trend data is not available for all questions.

All prices exclude VAT.

Click the image to see a series of screen shots.

Contents

Introduction

  • Introduction to the study
  • Module overview
  • Methodology
  • Defining your competitors
  • Defining the student segments
  • Definitions
  • Significant differences
  • Management summary

Your competitors

Your students

  • Introduction
  • Demographics –
  • Gender
  • Age
  • Ethnicity
  • Nationality
  • Whether lived in UK before starting university
  • Profile –
  • Type of school attended
  • Family members attended university
  • Term-time accommodation
  • Term-time distance from home/permanent address
  • Student loans
  • Maintenance grants and scholarships/bursaries
  • UCAS points
  • Proportion paying overseas fees
  • Proportion of widening-access students
  • Student clusters – demographic profile and characteristics
  • Clusters in comparison

Applying to university

  • Introduction
  • Whether current university was firm choice or insurance choice
  • Firm choice universities
  • Insurance choice universities
  • Proportion attending their favourite university
  • Timing of university application

Marketing and communications

  • Introduction
  • Online sources used to investigate universities applied to
  • Offline sources used to investigate universities applied to
  • Print newspapers used to investigate universities applied to
  • Most useful sources of information – online & offline
  • League tables used when making university choice
  • Media sources used by those who went through clearing
  • How students were contacted by their current university
  • How students would most like to have been contacted
  • Who from their current university contacted them
  • Who students would have most liked contact from
  • Whether contact made them more or less likely to want to attend
  • Top 10 reasons institutions are considered best at communicating
  • Application process – importance & performance – how you compare

Key reasons for choosing and declining

  • Introduction
  • Key unprompted reasons for choosing current university – you/your competitors/UK sample
  • Verbatim responses for reasons for choosing you
  • Verbatim responses for reasons for choosing your competitors
  • Unprompted reasons for declining any university – all UK decliners
  • Key unprompted reasons for declining your offer – your decliners
  • Verbatim responses for reasons for declining your offer
  • Key unprompted factors that would have attracted all UK decliners
  • Key unprompted factors that would have attracted your decliners
  • Verbatim responses for factors that would have attracted your decliners

University choice factors

  • Introduction
  • All attributes ranked by importance

Choosing a course

  • Introduction
  • Key reasons for choosing the subject currently being studied
  • Course – importance & performance – how you compare

Employability, reputation and recommendations

  • Introduction
  • Influence of future employability/earning potential on course choice
  • Influence of future employability/earning potential on university choice
  • Student perceptions of graduate employability
  • Student perceptions of what improves graduate employability
  • Student access to activities that improve graduate employability
  • Future employability – importance & performance – how you compare
  • Reputation – importance & performance – how you compare
  • Recommendations – importance & performance – how you compare

Facilities and social life

  • Introduction
  • Campus facilities – importance & performance – how you compare
  • Social life – importance & performance – how you compare

Open days

  • Introduction
  • Proportion attending an open day or visiting institutions applied to
  • Open days attended at institutions applied to – by WP group – UK sample
  • Number of open days attended/visits made at institutions applied to
  • Number of open days attended at institutions applied to – by age – UK sample
  • Number of open days attended at institutions applied to – by WP group – UK sample
  • Proportion who attended an open day at their current institution
  • Why students attended open days – prompted
  • Verbatim responses for why students didn’t attend open day at your university
  • Timing of open day visits – yours vs. your competitors’
  • Who organised open days – yours vs. your competitors’
  • Who accompanied students to open day
  • Proportion interviewed or assessed
  • Did interview/assessment make students more or less likely to attend
  • Why students were more/less likely to want to attend after interview
  • Actual and desired activities – at current institution – UK sample
  • Actual and desired activities at non-current institutions – UK sample
  • Actual and desired open day activities – your students
  • Actual and desired open day activities – your competitors’ students
  • Usefulness of your open day activities – all attendees
  • Usefulness of competitors’ open day activities –all attendees
  • Participation vs usefulness of your open day activities
  • Open days – importance & performance – how you compare
  • Whether open day changed how much students wanted to attend

Location

  • Introduction
  • Preference for living at home vs. living away from home
  • Preferred proximity from home amongst those who prefer to live away
  • Extent to which cost was a factor in decision to live at home
  • Importance of cultural, outdoor and community life
  • Key cultural resources sought by those who value cultural life
  • Key outdoor resources sought by those who value outdoor life
  • Key community resources sought by those who value community life
  • Location – importance & performance – how you compare

Costs

  • Introduction
  • Influence of tuition fees on whether to attend university
  • Influence of tuition fees on whether to attend university – by WP group – UK sample
  • Ways decision to attend university was affected by tuition fees – unprompted
  • Influence of tuition fees on which institution to attend
  • Influence of tuition fees on which institution to attend – by WP group – UK sample
  • Ways institution choice was affected by tuition fees – unprompted
  • How choice was affected by tuition fees – prompted
  • How choice was affected by tuition fees – prompted – by WP group – UK sample
  • Value of financial assistance received
  • Type of financial assistance received
  • Level of concern regarding student debt
  • Costs – importance & performance – how you compare

Induction, transition and initial satisfaction

  • Introduction
  • Induction activities and sessions offered
  • How useful induction activities were – your students
  • How useful induction activities were – all participants
  • How induction activities and sessions assisted students
  • Extent to which students know where to go if they have a problem
  • Satisfaction with current institution
  • Extent to which current institution meets expectations
  • Extent to which expectations are met – by fee status – UK sample
  • Proportion who have seriously regretted their choice of institution

Appendices

  • About Opinionpanel
  • Institutions in sample
  • Questions used to identify student segments
  • Usage of findings

*Table of contents based on 2010/11 study. Subject to minor changes in 2011/12.

Free stuff!

  • FREE on-site presentation of findings to your team (when M2 and M3 purchased together)
  • FREE sample boosting (when M2 and M3 purchased together)

More about boosting your sample

The findings from Higher Expectations have made a significant impact on the way we run our open days and accomodation tours.