Aged 13-30? Brands pay to hear your opinions Sign up and get paid in £25 vouchers Sign me up
Sign me up
Articles > Politics June, 02, 2015

Why Michael Gove repealing the Human Rights Act for Britain is terrible news

James Maxwell
View Profile


10.00 / 10

Michael Gove is back and has been appointed Secretary of State for Justice. The man who once described your teachers as “the Blob” and who openly supported the death penalty, has been given the task of repealing the Human Rights Act and replacing it with a British Bill of Rights. Just in case you have forgotten him, he highly irritated nearly every student with his educational reforms.

But before we get into why I oppose this move, we shall first explore the origins of the 1998 Human Rights Act. After the atrocities of the Second World War, the Allied Powers came together and declared “never again”. The Council of Europe drafted the European Convention on Human Rights. The Convention aims to protect basic rights and freedoms across Europe, its composition was inspired by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Since then, the Convention has made its way into the statue books, enabling claimants (aka pure yappers) to challenge the government in domestic courts; rather than submitting a claim to Strasbourg (where the European Court of Human Rights is located).

Since then, it has protected the most vulnerable in our society. It has protected women and children from abusive partners, ordered the deletion of DNA files on innocent people and has curtailed the ‘Bedroom Tax’ from hitting the vulnerable. And although it may be unpopular with the right wing tabloids, the Convention is best demonstrated in protecting the rule of law. Even the rights of suspects are protected under the Convention, preventing terror suspects from deportation where they will almost certainly face inhumane treatment.

If you are still reading this then I’m glad I haven’t bored you. So, why should the British Bill of Rights be opposed?

  1. A British Bill of Rights rushed up by the Conservatives would result in a botched document, that will fail to protect the rights and freedoms we all take for granted in the United Kingdom.
  2. It would restrict the levels of judicial oversight on the government.
  3. It will conflict with the ECHR, meaning we would have to withdraw (joining Belarus which has a poor human rights record).
  4. It has nothing to do with losing Parliamentary sovereignty to the EU. The EU has little to do with the Convention, despite the Tory press office tweeting otherwise.

What can I do to prevent the repeal of the HRA?

  1. Lobby, lobby, lobby. Make sure you get in contact with your Member of Parliament about this issue, and stress the importance of keeping the Human Rights Act.
  2. Did I mention lobbying? Don’t forget to write to the House of Lords too. Professor Russell highlights the role Lib Dem peers may play in opposing a repeal.
  3. Sign a petition, or two. Here >>
  4. Make a fuss!

Just for the record — I don’t oppose a British Bill of Rights in principle. I oppose the government playing party politics over our freedoms. A British Bill of Rights should extend upon the rights guaranteed in the Human Rights Act and the European Convention on Human Rights, not take them away.


Rate this Article
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars6 Stars7 Stars8 Stars9 Stars10 Stars

Join our community!

Join and get £10 free credit

Earn points for completing surveys and other research opportunities

Get shopping vouchers and treat yo self!

Be the first to respond

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.